UL INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Unilever PLC and Announces that Investors with Substantial Losses Have

SAN DIEGO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP declared that it has submitted a course action lawsuit in search of to represent purchasers or acquirers of Unilever PLC (NYSE: UL) American Depository Receipts (“ADRs”) concerning September 2, 2020 and July 21, 2021, inclusive (the “Class Period”). The Unilever class motion lawsuit – Metropolis of St. Clair Shores Law enforcement and Fireplace Retirement Process v. Unilever PLC, No. 22-cv-05011 (S.D.N.Y.) – prices Unilever as perfectly as certain of its leading executives and administrators with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

If you suffered sizeable losses and would like to serve as guide plaintiff, you should submit your info below:

https://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases-unilever-plc-course-action-lawsuit-ul.html

You can also get hold of attorney J.C. Sanchez of Robbins Geller by contacting 800/449-4900 or by way of e-mail at [email protected]. Lead plaintiff motions for the Unilever course motion lawsuit must be filed with the court docket no later on than August 15, 2022.

Situation ALLEGATIONS: Unilever is a British multinational client items firm. Ben & Jerry’s ice cream is just one of Unilever’s marquee makes, which stays a wholly owned subsidiary of Unilever with an unbiased board addressing Ben & Jerry’s Social Mission. In July 2020, Ben & Jerry’s board handed a resolution to end sales of Ben & Jerry’s solutions in regions that the board considers to be Palestinian territories illegally occupied by Israel.

The Unilever class motion lawsuit alleges that, all through the Course Time period, defendants manufactured phony and deceptive statements and unsuccessful to disclose that in July 2020, Ben & Jerry’s board handed a resolution to stop sales of its ice product in “Occupied Palestinian Territory” as effectively as the hazards attendant to the board’s determination. Moreover, Unilever’s s description of its legal dangers was materially false and misleading since Unilever acknowledged that complying with all applicable legislation and rules was crucial but omitted talking about Ben & Jerry’s boycott conclusion, which risked adverse governmental actions for violations of legal guidelines, govt orders, or resolutions aimed at discouraging boycotts, divestment, and sanctions of Israel adopted by 35 U.S. states (“Anti-BDS Legislation”).

On July 19, 2021, Unilever and its hand-picked Ben & Jerry’s CEO, Matthew McCarthy, lastly “operationalized” the Ben & Jerry’s board’s resolution to boycott Israel. Ben & Jerry’s declared on its web site and via its Twitter account that, upon the expiration of the current licensing agreement by which its merchandise had been dispersed in Israel for many years, Ben & Jerry’s would end revenue of its ice cream in “Occupied Palestinian Territory” but Ben & Jerry’s would purportedly continue to sell its products in Israel. On this news, the price of Unilever ADRs fell.

Then, July 22, 2021, CNBC noted that the states of Texas and Florida had been examining Ben & Jerry’s steps in link with the states’ Anti-BDS Laws. In addition to condemnation of Ben & Jerry’s boycott by Texas Governor Greg Abbott, CNBC claimed that Texas Condition Comptroller Glenn Hegar, who controls billions of pounds in property for Texas’ general public pension resources, had by now explained to his business to get motion. Similarly, the point out of Florida’s CFO Jimmy Patronis, who controls Florida’s general public pension cash, told CNBC that his workplace was presently speaking about the concern. In a letter reportedly despatched to Ben & Jerry’s CEO, Patronis wrote: “It is my perception that Ben & Jerry’s brazen refusal to do business in Israel will final result in your placement on the Scrutinized Companies that Boycott Israel List.” The letter also said that Florida would then “be prohibited from investing in Ben & Jerry’s or its father or mother corporation, Unilever.” Getting extra to the list also intended that Unilever would not be capable to enter or renew contracts with the point out or any municipality in Florida. On this information, the cost of Unilever ADRs fell additional than 5%, further more harmful buyers.

In the long run, the states of New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Illinois, Colorado, and Arizona declared selections to divest their pension fund investments in Unilever because of to violations of their Anti-BDS Laws.

The plaintiff is represented by Robbins Geller, which has comprehensive practical experience in prosecuting trader class steps together with steps involving fiscal fraud. You can watch a copy of the complaint by clicking below.

THE Lead PLAINTIFF System: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who bought or obtained Unilever ADRs throughout the Course Interval to seek appointment as guide plaintiff in the Unilever course action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is frequently the movant with the finest economical curiosity in the relief sought by the putative course who is also common and enough of the putative class.

ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller is 1 of the world’s top complex class action firms representing plaintiffs in securities fraud situations. The Company is rated #1 on the 2021 ISS Securities Course Action Companies Major 50 Report for recovering almost $2 billion for investors very last yr alone – much more than triple the amount of money recovered by any other plaintiffs’ business. With 200 lawyers in 9 offices, Robbins Geller is a single of the largest plaintiffs’ firms in the planet and the Firm’s attorneys have acquired a lot of of the biggest securities class action recoveries in historical past, including the greatest securities class motion restoration ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Remember to take a look at the pursuing web page for more data:

https://www.rgrdlaw.com/solutions-litigation-securities-fraud.html

Lawyer advertising.

Previous success do not promise future results.

Products and services may perhaps be carried out by attorneys in any of our workplaces.

Contacts

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP

655 W. Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101

J.C. Sanchez, 800-449-4900

[email protected]